And why are all of the tank-objectives made by custom mappers Tiger tanks? Maybe not all, but in MY experience, all. Why not Panzers? WHAT IS WRONG WITH PANZERS?! Could anyone answer this, or is it a universal secret that I have not yet been let in on?

i've seen a few, but why does everyone want to use a tank as an objective? Especially when the clip brushes are allways so half-assed.

Tiger > Panzer

Play dod_martello and tell me how good the clip brush is on the Tiger Tank.

Actully ... you'll probable hate the map ... scrath that idea :kitty:

I used King Tigers in density because there no normal tank, those things were the gods of WW2 tanks. Panzers just don't cut it next to one of them.

That's true....about Tigers being better...in most aspects, but still....Panzers existed!:p

So it is a clip problem?

.So it is a clip problem?

Originally posted by Ginger Lord
those things were the gods of WW2 tanks. Panzers just don't cut it next to one of them.

No ... as Ginger Lord said, Tigers own :kitty:

Panzers were like grunts, very common nothing worth letting people die for. A King Tiger is like seeing a General ramboing with dual MG42's. Worth the risk.