[MREL] M1 Garand
nojmaster
10-06-2003, 02:09 PM
Model by me, skin by my brother [$]pEcTrE, anyone whos around the FA modeling scene is likely to have seen our stuff, but I've always wanted to do a Garand and DoD seemed the logical place for it.
Pictar (http://mysite.freeserve.com/pichosting/garand.jpg)
**Download** (http://mysite.freeserve.com/pichosting/m1garand.zip)
Smallpox
10-06-2003, 02:20 PM
i couldn't do better, but the end of it is too narrow. i'm pretty sure its the fault of the HL engine, so you may want to widen the barrel. other than that, it looks fine.
Otacon
10-06-2003, 02:57 PM
Arg! too many new garands. First MrFus, then marzy's enhanced default, then FOV MrFus, and now another new model XD I'll have to take a look at this later, as I'm kinda busy right now.
Lorda Mercy
10-06-2003, 02:58 PM
good effort
i really really like the skin, could you make a FOV version. cause the front barrel is hardly noticeable :D
Mortar
10-06-2003, 03:06 PM
I don't like the texture.
the end of the garand lacks with propotion.
poly is too low imo.
and i don't like the angle, it looks like half iron sight half not.
It's a nice try, i hope you can upgrade it a little here and there.
nextime try showing some pictures before the release to hear some tips or advices here and there, not by me, by the great creators in this community.
i'll sum it up, imo it needs another try. my opinion only.
cheers.
P.S
im glad for you (and them) that other people like :)
Pvt. Paradox
10-06-2003, 04:03 PM
Originally posted by Mortar
I don't like the texture.
the end of the garand lacks with propotion.
poly is too low imo.
and i don't like the angle, it looks like half iron sight half not.
It's a nice try, i hope you can upgrade it a little here and there.
nextime try showing some pictures before the release to hear some tips or advices here and there, not by me, by the great creators in this community.
i'll sum it up, imo it needs another try. my opinion only.
cheers.
P.S
im glad for you (and them) that other people like :)
nojmaster
10-06-2003, 05:38 PM
I purposely left out FoVing. It looks like utter ass. I grew up on DoD 2.0 where the models weren't horribly distorted. All other mods as far as im aware don't do it. Most players are used to normaly proportioned models, distorted as they are by the engine, including myself. Look at the new FoV'ed weapons. Check the lines of perspective, they are distorted to the extent that they curve the other way, making the models look way too fat towards the end, especially like the thompson and mp44.
PedroTheLion
10-06-2003, 06:28 PM
i think it looks fine. i'm not a big fan of the origin you chose for it, but that's real easy to fix. If you look at it from the side, it does actually look like a real m1-garand. good work.
Sushi
10-06-2003, 06:47 PM
its an excellent effort, leave the FOV part to someone else. If you think you can still improve it, go ahead.
Originally posted by nojmaster
I purposely left out FoVing. It looks like utter ass. I grew up on DoD 2.0 where the models weren't horribly distorted. All other mods as far as im aware don't do it. Most players are used to normaly proportioned models, distorted as they are by the engine, including myself. Look at the new FoV'ed weapons. Check the lines of perspective, they are distorted to the extent that they curve the other way, making the models look way too fat towards the end, especially like the thompson and mp44.
Preach it!
Dillinger
10-06-2003, 11:31 PM
Originally posted by AFG
Preach it! Seriously! FOV sucks, and anyone from 3.1 or earlier will probably agree!
I like this model for some reason, but I don't like how the reticule and such is smashed in. Both sides are angling in.
Dances w Wolves
10-07-2003, 04:15 AM
good work, acrtually REALLY like this, this is one of the best garands ive seen in my years here. good job.
Grain
10-07-2003, 02:59 PM
Originally posted by Dillinger
Seriously! FOV sucks, and anyone from 3.1 or earlier will probably agree!
I like this model for some reason, but I don't like how the reticule and such is smashed in. Both sides are angling in. Not me. I think the 3.1 weapons looked way too skinny. How ever the current stretch used for FOV versions is too wide. I would love to see something in between. stretched but as much as now.
Originally posted by Dillinger
Seriously! FOV sucks, and anyone from 3.1 or earlier will probably agree!
I like this model for some reason, but I don't like how the reticule and such is smashed in. Both sides are angling in.
ive played since beta 1, and i really think FOV is a great idea. not with the thompson or MP40 , but with the garand it makes the barrel show out. in 3.1 , i HATED nomads garand b.c without FOV, the front looked like some fat thing with the tip of the barrel shopped off.
Rotkopf
10-07-2003, 04:18 PM
Iīve been playing since the very first beta release, and I like the FOV weapons much better as well. Why? Because they look like that in real life. Weapons donīt get magically thinner at the end of the barrel because the end is about 30-80 cm away from your face (depending on the gunīs size). The stock weapons actually look very realistic with their large front sites.
Sabor_Wolf
10-07-2003, 06:48 PM
u can never have enough garands... im a garand*****.. if theres such a thing... then after that a thompson/mp40, then after that mp44, then after that 98k, then after that sniper :):)
Smallpox
10-07-2003, 07:52 PM
Originally posted by Sabor_Wolf
u can never have enough garands... im a garand*****.. if theres such a thing... then after that a thompson/mp40, then after that mp44, then after that 98k, then after that sniper :):)
amazing, tell me more.
Brutal
10-07-2003, 08:16 PM
the more garands the merrier
Billie|Joe
10-08-2003, 07:26 PM
i second the motion.
Day of Defeat Forum Archive created by
Neil Jedrzejewski.
This in an partial archive of the old Day of Defeat forums orignally hosted by
Valve Software LLC.
Material has been archived for the purpose of creating a knowledge base from messages posted between 2003 and 2008.